Free Essays on Condom Distribution

The Answer is Condom Distribution In an ever-changing world, we as a society must yield to old ways and begin change according to today’s values, morals, and reality. One hot topic in today’s government and high school hallways is the issue of condom distribution rights. In the following pages I will defend the value of sexual safety for the individual and their communities. Throughout my paper I will convince the reader that condom distribution along with proper education is the proper policy that our country needs to seek. Along with these two components our communities will notice rapid change in sexual knowledge and practices. The United States is in a current dilemma. Many advocates apt for change through teaching abstinence as a control of STD’s and pregnancy rates. However, polls show us that America’s teen are sexually active more and more often then we want to believe. In a recent poll nearly 80% of all teens age 15-19 have had at least one sexual encounter, leading to over 46, 000 pregnancies in that category alone. Why is the United States government so blind of these figures? How will teaching abstinence help these 80% who are already sexually active? In 1996 Congress allocated $50 million to fund an abstinence-until-marriage education in high schools. These actions suggest that the primary goal of this country is preventing teenagers from having sex, not preventing disease and pregnancy from the 80% who are sexually active. This could in fact lead to current sexually active teens to feel morbid about their sexuality and decrease the amount of protected sex they have because of feelings of guilt. North America has the highest rates of teenage pregnancy, STD transmission, and out-of-wedlock births. Many say this is related to the suppressed nature that the United States uses to discuss sex, if ever done. The fact that many teens are prohibited from having sex prior to marriage is definitely ... Free Essays on Condom Distribution Free Essays on Condom Distribution The Answer is Condom Distribution In an ever-changing world, we as a society must yield to old ways and begin change according to today’s values, morals, and reality. One hot topic in today’s government and high school hallways is the issue of condom distribution rights. In the following pages I will defend the value of sexual safety for the individual and their communities. Throughout my paper I will convince the reader that condom distribution along with proper education is the proper policy that our country needs to seek. Along with these two components our communities will notice rapid change in sexual knowledge and practices. The United States is in a current dilemma. Many advocates apt for change through teaching abstinence as a control of STD’s and pregnancy rates. However, polls show us that America’s teen are sexually active more and more often then we want to believe. In a recent poll nearly 80% of all teens age 15-19 have had at least one sexual encounter, leading to over 46, 000 pregnancies in that category alone. Why is the United States government so blind of these figures? How will teaching abstinence help these 80% who are already sexually active? In 1996 Congress allocated $50 million to fund an abstinence-until-marriage education in high schools. These actions suggest that the primary goal of this country is preventing teenagers from having sex, not preventing disease and pregnancy from the 80% who are sexually active. This could in fact lead to current sexually active teens to feel morbid about their sexuality and decrease the amount of protected sex they have because of feelings of guilt. North America has the highest rates of teenage pregnancy, STD transmission, and out-of-wedlock births. Many say this is related to the suppressed nature that the United States uses to discuss sex, if ever done. The fact that many teens are prohibited from having sex prior to marriage is definitely ...

Sumptuous

Sumptuous Sumptuous Sumptuous By Maeve Maddox In response to my post about the use of the word unctuous in the context of cooking, several readers suggested that speakers might be confusing unctuous with sumptuous. If they are, they must not know the meaning of sumptuous. English-speaking cooks who use unctuous to describe pork roasts are referring to taste, texture, and juiciness. The word sumptuous, although often used to describe a meal, has nothing to do with the taste of food. The word sumptuous derives from the Latin verb sÃ… «mÄ•re, â€Å"to take, consume, spend.† From the verb comes the Latin adjective sumptuosus, â€Å"costly, expensive.† At different periods of history, governments passed what were called â€Å"sumptuary laws,† laws that criminalized overspending by certain social classes. The expression â€Å"born to the purple,† meaning, â€Å"born into the royal family,† comes from sumptuary laws that restricted the use of an expensive dye called Tyrian purple. In ancient Rome, for example, only the emperor could wear a Tyrian purple cape trimmed in golden thread. Only senators were permitted to decorate their togas with a Tyrian purple stripe. European sumptuary laws were enacted throughout the Middle Ages and the Renaissance and even found their way to the New World. The Massachusetts Bay Colony passed a sumptuary law to limit the wearing of lace, gold buttons, ruffles, capes, and other expensive items to citizens with a net worth of 200 pounds or more. A sumptuous meal is an expensive meal. It will have numerous courses made up of a wide variety of dishes and drinks. Here’s a description of a sumptuous dinner offered at the cost of $99,300 by a caterer to the rich and famous: The dinner includes ritzy ingredients such as duck eggs and truffles, as well as a dish of Wagyu beef touched with silver leaf that’s served on a bed of dry ice. Each dish in the eight-course meal is combined with a fine wine, such as the $27,680 bottle of La Romanee-Conti, Domaine de la Romanee-Conti, 1990. The price tag also includes a harpist, a poet and doves, as well as chef Adam Simmonds, who earned a Michelin star in 2006.   One can probably assume that such an expensive and lavishly produced meal would include well prepared, tasty food, but not necessarily. It would be possible for a sumptuous meal to be lacking in palate-pleasing food. Another reader suggests that unctuous may be a mistake for scrumptious; an interesting thought, as scrumptious is a colloquial coinage thought to be an altered form of sumptuous. Initially, expensive or luxurious things were described as scrumptious, for example, â€Å"a scrumptious house.† Then, scrumptious became a general term of enthusiastic praise like wizard or smashing, for example, â€Å"That portrait of Thomas More is really scrumptious!† Finally, because it must have often been applied to food, scrumptious came to mean delicious. Another comment points to a possible explanation for the trending use of unctuous with English-speaking cooks: onctuex (feminine, onctueuse) is used by French cooks to describe food that is creamy. However, I can’t think that a word meaning creamy is exactly the right one to describe a pork roast. English has enough adjectives to describe things that taste good without resorting to unctuous or scrumptious. Here are a few: delicious delectable mouthwatering appetizing tasty flavorful toothsome palatable succulent luscious Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:35 Synonyms for â€Å"Look†At Your DisposalApostrophe with Plural Possessive Nouns